0370 1500 100

Carl Dyer

Partner

Biography

Carl has nearly thirty-five years' experience in planning and development, with a particular focus on retail and mixed use regeneration projects.  Carl also promotes housing, care homes, crematoria, and significant commercial developments - including the biggest print works in the world for News Group UK. He is also the recipient of the Anthony London Law Prize.

Market View

"He's very commercially minded and comes back to us very quickly," comments an impressed client, continuing: "He tells you how it is and won't give you a lot of flowery talk." - Chambers & Partners 2017

Recent highlights

  • For Corona Group and Santon:  promoting the regeneration of North-East Lewes to provide a new residential district with 401 homes, business space, including artisans' units, and supporting infrastructure and flood defences;
  • For Asda, and various retail developers, achieving consent for more than a dozen major food stores over the last two years, and scores over the last twenty years, including many retail-led town centre regeneration schemes;
  • Achieving a 4,570 square metres redevelopment of the Queen Elizabeth Foundation charitable facilities enabled by seventy-six new homes in the Surrey Green Belt for the Queen Elizabeth Foundation and Welbeck Land;
  • Helping to achieve planning permission for crematoria developments for Westerleigh Group variously at Gedling, Great Glen, Romsey, Uttlesford, and Newport in South Wales; and
  • Securing planning permission for Roffey Homes on its prestigious residential/hotel redevelopment scheme on Worthing seafront, and acting on its residential redevelopment project on the Worthing Aquarena site.

Market View

Carl Dyer "has the ability to explain complex matters in an easy way." – Chambers & Partners, 2018

Read My Comments On The Latest News

  • 19/04/2018
    Labour Announces Green Paper: 'Housing for the Many'

    “In 1977 Olivia Newton John sang a love song: ‘Making a Good Thing Better’. 40 years later Labour has just published its own version: a Green Paper which could be sub-titled ‘Making a Bad Thing Worse’. “We have a national housing crisis, largely as a result of a dysfunctional town and country planning system, and many of Labour’s new proposals would make it worse. “One of the barriers to house building is the ever rising affordable housing tax on house building. Labour wants to increase it. Market house building would become less profitable, so there would be less of it. “Affordable housing would be redefined by reference to local incomes instead of local market prices. So the gap between the cost of provision and the return would get larger. If the cost of producing anything increases, at the margin people will produce less of it. “The target is 1 million “genuinely” affordable homes over ten years. That is 100,000 “genuinely” affordable homes a year. That is more than half of all current annual house building. “That 1 million target is split: 100,000 “genuinely” affordable homes in the first five years; so 180,000 a year for the next five years. That would be more than annual house building production. “After Labour’s last 13 years in power from 1997 to 2010, their out-going Chief Secretary to the Treasury famously left a note for his successor: “Sorry, there’s no money”. There is still no magic money tree, and no indication here how these homes are to be funded. “It is difficult to see any private sector rush into house-building to meet these numbers when all that is promised is higher affordable housing costs and an increasing range or arbitrary regulations. “Already (even before this Green Paper) we are seeing land owners asking for “Corbyn Clauses” to be built into promotion agreements with developers, asking for the right not to proceed if the public levy on the development achieved makes the return on the land required unacceptable. Better to hold it for the next generation. “Even without achieving office, Labour’s policies have the potential to reduce the supply of land for housing. “Our restrictive planning system in its present form is indefensible. But it takes a rare talent to think deeply, and then come up with a package of proposals that will make it still worse.”

    Continue Reading
  • 06/03/2018
    NPPF Review

    “I hope to goodness that Theresa May is better briefed on Europe than she is on planning. She has clearly not thought this through properly. "Where to begin? "She wants developers and communities to co-operate more. The problem is that most communities want development in other communities. Everyone wants housing; but they want in the next ward or borough; not theirs. "She starts from a premise that developers are land banking. Someone should tell her that her government has asked Oliver Letwin to investigate whether that is true, and it would be sensible not to make pronouncements on the subject until he has reported on the facts. (Unless Mrs May has already decided what his findings are to be, irrespective of the facts he finds). "She is talking of taking build out rates into account when granting planning permissions. This is flatly contrary to the premise that planning permissions are not personal: they run with the land. And many developers don’t have build-out rates, because they sell the land on to house builders – many of whom don’t want to be involved in the planning system: they outsource that risk, so that they can buy “oven-ready” sites from developers. "Talks of wanting to cut red tape; then totally contradicts herself by saying she wants to make it harder to get permission. Developers only are able to 'game' the system because the system is so badly broken. "And nothing in the consultation draft out this week is going to change that.”

    Continue Reading
  • 21/11/2017
    Irwin Mitchell Helps Deliver Planning For The Second Tallest Building In The UK

    "This will be an amazing landmark for South London. We are delighted to be part of such an exciting scheme that will help put Croydon firmly on the map. "

    Continue Reading
  • 26/10/2017
    How Serious Is The Government In Meeting Its Housing Objectives?

    It’s crazy that ministers are getting involved in schemes of a few dozen homes. Below 1000, the government should leave well alone.

    Continue Reading