Call us on
0370 1500 100
I am a Solicitor in the Public Law & Human Rights (PLHR) department at Irwin Mitchell. I lead the PLHR team in Southampton and am responsible for the South Coast region.
I specialise in community care and mental capacity law; my work includes:
Most of my clients are vulnerable and/or disabled children, adults or their family members. Normally the cases I handle are funded by legal aid and when this isn’t available, I explore what other funding arrangements might be suitable.
Before taking a law conversion course and joining Irwin Mitchell, I achieved a first class BA at the University of Toronto and an MSt at Oxford University. My master's dissertation focused on international human rights law for LGBT people.
I am a Committee Member of the Law Society's Access to Justice Committee, which works to promote improvements in the availability and operation of legal aid and in access to justice. In my spare time, I volunteer with Southampton Mencap.
"Alice has proved to be a huge asset to our services; not least because of her skills in dealing with complicated court orders, position statements and witness statements.
"Alice’s advocacy skills... are excellent. Alice is obviously comfortable within the courtroom; can communicate and project clearly, is orally articulate, persuasive and concise and whilst following complex information, Alice ensures she listens carefully to others and has the ability to think and communicate quickly and clearly.
"Alice has been able to research quickly, analysing thoroughly and has the ability to distil this information for us to find useful and manageable; describing complex areas of the law in a simple manner to ensure we fully understand." - Jan Gavin, Chief Executive, Southern Advocacy Services
“It has been a complete pleasure working with Alice and I tell everyone how fantastic she and Irwin Mitchell are.” - Client
“We can't thank enough our lawyer, Alice Cullingworth, who did all the hard work to make things happen.”- Client
“This has been a very emotional time for the families we represent, as they simply want to ensure that their children can get access to the education they need and deserve.
“The parents we act for are unable to provide transport due to work and other commitments and they were very upset at the prospect of this issue impacting on their children’s wellbeing.
“While we recognise that local government across the UK is facing difficult times at the moment, it is welcome to see that the council has changed its position and reconsidered its post-16 transport policy. It is absolutely vital that vulnerable students are able to access the support they need to get the best from life.”
“This is an incredibly emotive case and it has been hugely difficult for the loved ones of PL to make the decision in terms of applying for treatment to come to an end. The patient’s full circumstances and her human rights were considered by the court before arriving at a decision that it was in her best interests to provide palliative care only.
“This case is truly heart-breaking and we only hope that if the family can draw any comfort from this outcome, it is that the wishes of their much-loved mother and wife will have been met.”
We were assured at the meeting that all the officers and clinicians involved in this case genuinely want to resolve the issues with Ben’s care.
“The formation of the steering group marks a milestone in ensuring Ben receives the level of care he deserves. There is still some way to go but we are pleased with the progress that has been made.
“We will continue to work with everyone involved to resolve the issues that have been identified. We hope that the parties’ offer for interim support will be sufficient so that an application to court will no longer be necessary.”
“Situations like these faced by HS and VM highlight why it is so important that no further steps to close the service are taken before the Cabinet announces its new decision.
“Parents were told by the council that the centre will not be closed unless there is suitable alternative respite provision to meet the complex needs of their adult children. Sadly, we remain of the view that suitable alternative provision has not been identified for all centre users. If and when suitable alternative provision is identified, the law requires that there should be a carefully planned transition process for these service users, due to the complexity of their needs.”
Request A Call Back
Enter your details below and we'll call you back, at a time of your choice.
This data will only be used by Irwin Mitchell for processing your query and for no other purpose.