0370 1500 100

Smith & Nephew Acknowledges Greater Risk Of Revision With BHR Hip Implants, Lawyers Reveal

New Warnings Issued On Revision Risks For Certain Patients


Specialist medical device lawyers have revealed their concerns after Smith & Nephew issued a notice updating the instructions for use (IFU) for its Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) System, with the manufacturer confirming specific types of patients are at a higher risk of revision.

The urgent field safety notice from Smith & Nephew revealed that female patients, men aged 65 or above and patients requiring an implant head size of less than 48mm are at a greater risk of requiring revision earlier than expected.

It has been confirmed that the IFU changes are applicable to specific catalogue numbers of the BHR Resurfacing Head, BHR Acetabular Cup and the BHR Dysplasia Cup, with more detail being available on the Smith & Nephew website.

Following the notice, specialist product liability lawyers at Irwin Mitchell have called on healthcare providers to ensure that small BHR replacement implants are no longer used in patients at high risk.

The experts act for hundreds of people affected by issues with faulty metal-on-metal hip devices across the UK and Europe, including many affected by problems with the BHR implant with femoral head components 46mm or smaller.

Expert Opinion
The new guidance issued by Smith & Nephew is a welcome step towards preventing certain sub-groups of patients from being at an earlier-than-expected risk of revision.

"However, it also raises concerns regarding the number of patients who fall into those categories and may have already been fitted with the affected devices. As such, it is vital that the manufacturer works quickly to provide more information regarding the issues, as well as providing an explanation as to why a recall has still not been issued for small BHR implants and why the instructions for use were not updated in 2012 when a revision rate of 11.76% was confirmed in women with a 42mm femoral component. The delay is clearly unacceptable.

"An issue of this nature is just the latest in a long line to raise concerns regarding the safety of hip replacement devices and many patients will be concerned to see these further concerns being raised.

"Patients put great faith and trust in the fact that the devices they are being fitted with are safe for use and meet the required standards. An issue of this nature once again calls into question how specific devices are able to make it to market and whether the regulatory system in place is fit for purpose.

"Every effort must be made to always put patient safety first and it is clear that there are many questions to be answered regarding these issues."
Kevin Timms, Solicitor

Our experienced personal injury claims team will provide you with free initial advice on your compensation claim if you have suffered as the result of metal-on-hip implants. View our Metal-On-Metal Hip Implants Claims page for more information.

© 2017 Irwin Mitchell LLP is Authorised & Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Our Regulatory Information.