Skip to main content
  • About
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • International
0808 291 3524
Dialog that contains search functionality
Irwin Mitchell Logo
  • Personal
    • Personal
    • Personal Home
    • Personal Injury Claims
      • Personal Injury Claims
      • Personal Injury Claims Home
      • Abuse Claims
      • Accidents In Public Places Claims
      • Criminal Injury Compensation Claims
      • Accident At Work Claims
      • Air, Rail & Maritime Claims
      • Asbestos & Mesothelioma Claims
      • Changing Solicitors During a Personal Injury Claim
      • Group Claims
      • Holiday Accidents & Illness Claims
      • Illness Compensation Claims
      • Industrial Disease Claims
      • Injury Types
      • Military Injury Compensation Claims
      • No Win No Fee Personal Injury Claims
      • Personal Injury Claims In Scotland
      • How To Claim Compensation For Personal Injury
      • Product Liability Claims
      • Road Traffic Accident Claims
      • Serious Injury Claims
      • Who Can Help?
      • Support Services
    • Medical Negligence Claims
      • Medical Negligence Claims
      • Medical Negligence Claims Home
      • Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims
      • Birth Injury Claims
      • Cauda Equina Syndrome Claims
      • Never Event Claims
      • Ambulance & Paramedic Medical Negligence Claims
      • Cosmetic Surgery Claims
      • Private Healthcare Claims
      • Cerebral Palsy Claims
      • Defective Medical Device Claims
      • Dental Negligence Claims
      • Diabetes Misdiagnosis Claims
      • Fatal Medical Negligence Claims & Inquests
      • GP Negligence Claims
      • Hospital Negligence Claims
      • What Is Medical Negligence?
      • Meningitis Misdiagnosis Claims
      • Failure To Prevent Suicide Claims
      • Misdiagnosis Claims
      • Ophthalmic Negligence Claims
      • Pregnancy & Gynaecology Injury Claims
      • Sepsis Negligence Claims
      • Pharmacy And Medication Negligence Claims
      • Shrewsbury & Telford Hospital NHS Trust Maternity Care Claims
      • Stroke Misdiagnosis Claims
      • Surgery Compensation Claims
    • Family Law
      • Family Law
      • Family Law Home
      • Divorce Solicitors
      • Prenuptial & Postnuptial Agreement Solicitors
      • Child Abduction Solicitors
      • Civil Partnership Solicitors
      • LGBT+ Family Law Solicitors
      • Unmarried Couples' Rights
      • Divorce Financial Settlement Solicitors
      • Child Arrangement Orders
      • Family Mediation
      • Out of Court Divorce Solicitors
      • Separation Agreement Solicitors
      • Adoption & Surrogacy Solicitors
    • Wills, Trusts & Estates
      • Wills, Trusts & Estates
      • Wills, Trusts & Estates Home
      • Estate Planning Solicitors
      • Powers Of Attorney
      • Trusts
      • Will Writing Services
      • Will Disputes & Contentious Probate
    • Will, Trust & Estate Disputes
      • Will, Trust & Estate Disputes
      • Will, Trust & Estate Disputes Home
      • Trust Disputes
      • Inheritance Act Claims
      • Contesting A Will
      • Contentious Probate
      • Pre-Death Agreements
      • Professional Negligence
      • Challenging A Lifetime Gift
      • Financial Abuse
      • Statutory Will Disputes
      • Defending A Contested Will
    • Conveyancing & Property Solicitors
      • Conveyancing & Property Solicitors
      • Conveyancing & Property Solicitors Home
      • Conveyancing Fees Calculator
      • Buying A Property
      • Selling A Property
      • Remortgage
      • Transfer Of Equity
      • Buy To Let
      • Freehold Purchase (Leasehold Enfranchisement) Solicitors
      • Lease Extension Solicitors
      • Conveyancing Guide
      • Residential Property Disputes
    • Tax
      • Tax
      • Tax Home
      • Charity & Philanthropy
      • Business Tax
      • Inheritance Tax
      • International Tax
      • Professional Negligence
      • HMRC Tax Investigations
      • Tax Disputes & Litigation
      • Tax Residence
      • Tax Returns & Compliance
      • UK Resident Non-Doms
      • Wealth Structuring
    • Probate
      • Probate
      • Probate Home
      • International Probate
      • Probate Sale Conveyancing
      • What Is Probate & How Does It Work?
    • Employment Solicitors
      • Employment Solicitors
      • Employment Solicitors Home
      • Employment Contract Solicitors
      • Employment Disputes
      • Dismissal & Redundancy Solicitors
      • Employment Discrimination Solicitors
      • Employment Lawyers for Legal Expenses Insurance
      • Harassment & Bullying At Work Solicitors
      • Parental & Family Friendly Employment Rights
      • Professional Discipline Solicitors
      • Recruitment & Promotion
      • Senior Executive Employment Lawyers
      • Settlement Agreements
      • Whistleblowing Solicitors
    • Protecting Your Rights
      • Protecting Your Rights
      • Protecting Your Rights Home
      • Actions Against The Police
      • Inquests
      • Environmental & Planning Law
      • Assessment & Treatment Unit Solicitors
      • Data Protection Breach Claims
      • Education Law
      • Healthcare & Social Services
      • Human Rights
      • Judicial Review
      • Mental Capacity
      • Professional Regulation & Discipline
      • Dispute Resolution
      • Legal Aid
    • Immigration Solicitors
      • Immigration Solicitors
      • Immigration Solicitors Home
      • British Citizenship & Naturalisation Solicitors
      • EU & EEA Immigration Solicitors
      • Indefinite Leave To Remain Solicitors
      • Spouse Visa Solicitors
      • Innovator Visa
      • Permanent Residence Solicitors
      • Business Immigration Solicitors
    • Crime & Investigations
      • Crime & Investigations
      • Crime & Investigations Home
      • Crime
      • Fraud & Financial Crime
      • Court Martial Solicitors
      • Motoring Offences Legal Advice
      • Regulatory Investigations & Enforcement
    • Insolvency
      • Insolvency
      • Insolvency Home
      • Business Restructuring & Insolvency
      • Debt Consultancy
      • Insolvency Disputes & Litigation
    • Counselling
      • Counselling
      • Counselling Home
      • Counselling Myths Dispelled
    • Court Of Protection
      • Court Of Protection
      • Court Of Protection Home
      • Court Of Protection Deputyship
      • Personal Injury Trusts
      • Court Of Protection Problems & Disputes
      • Healthcare and Social Services
      • Court of Protection Frequently Asked Questions
      • Powers Of Attorney Disputes
      • Statutory Wills Solicitors
  • Business
    • Business
    • Business Home
    • Sectors
      • Sectors
      • Sectors Home
      • Agriculture & Rural Business
      • Retail, Leisure & Hospitality
      • Education
      • Financial & Professional Services
      • Landed Estates
      • Manufacturing
      • Real Estate
      • Sport
      • Technology & Communications
    • Banking & Finance
      • Banking & Finance
      • Banking & Finance Home
      • Corporate Banking
      • Leveraged & Acquisition Finance
      • Real Estate Finance
      • Receivables Finance & Asset Based Lending
    • Environmental, Social & Governance
      • Environmental, Social & Governance
      • Environmental, Social & Governance Home
      • Cyber Security
      • Environment
      • Net Zero
      • Social
      • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Governance
      • International
      • ESG Legal Advisory Services
      • Legislation Library
      • Manufacturing Sector
      • Real Estate
      • Retail, Leisure and Hospitality Sector
      • Sports Sector
    • Business Crime
      • Business Crime
      • Business Crime Home
      • Anti-Bribery & Corruption
      • Asset Tracing & Recovery
      • Cartels & Illegal Price Fixing
      • Cybercrime
      • Dawn Raids
      • Deferred Prosecution Agreements
      • Extradition
      • INTERPOL Red Notices
      • Mutual Legal Assistance
      • Private Prosecution
      • Proceeds Of Crime Act
      • Unexplained Wealth Orders
      • Fraud Lawyers
      • Insider Trading & Market Abuse
      • Corporate Internal Investigations
    • Business Immigration
      • Business Immigration
      • Business Immigration Home
      • Business Visitor Visa
      • Global Business Mobility Visas
      • Innovator Visa
      • Prevention Of Illegal Working
      • Skilled Worker Visas
      • Sole Representative Of An Overseas Business
      • UK Visa Sponsor License
    • Commercial
      • Commercial
      • Commercial Home
      • Commercial Contracts
      • Competition Law
      • GDPR & Data Protection
      • Information Technology
      • Sourcing
      • Notary Public Solicitors
    • Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution
      • Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution
      • Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution Home
      • Banking & Finance Litigation
      • Business Interruption Insurance Lawyers
      • Contract Disputes
      • Defamation & Reputation Management
      • International & Cross-Border Disputes
      • Commercial Debt Recovery
      • Litigation Funding
      • Professional Negligence
    • Corporate
      • Corporate
      • Corporate Home
      • Corporate Advisory
      • Equity Capital Markets
      • Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A)
      • Private Equity
      • Search Funds and Entrepreneurship Through Acquisition Lawyers
    • Costs Team
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Law
      • Employment Law Home
      • Business Immigration
      • Employment Contracts, Policies & Procedures
      • Disciplinary & Grievance
      • Employee & Industrial Relations
      • Employment Lawyers for Legal Expenses Insurance
      • Employment Litigation & Resolution Lawyers
      • Equality, Diversity & Discrimination
      • Flexible Working Arrangements
      • Health & Safety
      • HR Advice Service - IMhrplus
      • Managing Sickness Absence
      • Pensions
      • Recruitment
      • Restrictive Covenants
      • Restructuring & Redundancy
      • Self Employment, Contractors & Agency Workers
      • Employment Seminars, Training & Updates
      • TUPE
    • In-House Counsel
    • Intellectual Property and Media
      • Intellectual Property and Media
      • Intellectual Property and Media Home
      • Defamation & Reputation Management
      • Brand Accelerator
      • Copyright Lawyers
      • Design Rights Lawyers
      • Image Rights Lawyers
      • Online Marketplace Seller Account Or Listing Suspensions
      • Stopping IP Infringement By Sellers On Online Marketplaces
      • Patent Lawyers
      • Trade Mark Lawyers
      • Trade Secrets Lawyers
    • Legal Helpline
    • Licensing
      • Licensing
      • Licensing Home
      • Betting & Gaming Licensing
      • Event Licences
      • Alcohol Licensing
    • Pensions
      • Pensions
      • Pensions Home
      • Employment
      • Managing Death Benefit Trusts
    • Regulatory & Compliance
      • Regulatory & Compliance
      • Regulatory & Compliance Home
      • Road Transport & Operator Compliance
      • GDPR & Data Protection
      • Regulatory Investigations
      • Account Freezing Orders
      • Anti-Money Laundering
      • Companies House Prosecutions
      • Environment & Safety Regulatory Compliance
      • Financial Services Regulation
    • Real Estate
      • Real Estate
      • Real Estate Home
      • Corporate Occupiers
      • Real Estate Development and Regeneration
      • Construction & Engineering
      • Environmental
      • Real Estate Finance
      • Real Estate Investment
      • Later Living & Care
      • Planning
      • Property Litigation & Real Estate Disputes
      • Real Estate Tax
      • Residential Development
      • Strategic Land
      • Structured Real Estate
    • Restructuring & Insolvency
      • Restructuring & Insolvency
      • Restructuring & Insolvency Home
      • Corporate Insolvency
      • Partnership Insolvency
      • Directors' Duties
      • Restructuring Plans
      • Debt Recovery (up to £100,000) – Pricing
      • Restructuring
    • Tax
      • Tax
      • Tax Home
      • Corporate Tax
      • Real Estate Tax
      • Tax Investigations
  • People
    • People
    • People Home
    • Search By Name
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Expertise
    • Business Management
  • Offices
    • Offices
    • Offices Home
    • Birmingham
    • Brighton
    • Bristol
    • Cambridge
    • Cardiff
    • Chichester
    • Edinburgh
    • Gatwick
    • Glasgow
    • Leeds
    • Liverpool
    • London
    • Manchester
    • Middlesbrough
    • Newbury
    • Newcastle
    • North Yorkshire
    • Nottingham
    • Reading
    • Sheffield
    • Southampton
  • Contact
  • About
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • International
Irwin Mitchell Logo
Dialog with Irwin Mitchell phone number
Call us on 0808 291 3524

We're here 24/7, 365 days a year.

man in a coffee shop using a mobile phone and a laptop
  • Home
  • News & Insights
  • News
  • Gender Pay Reporting

Gender Pay Reporting

27.09.2021

The Pitfalls Of Reducing The Gap In Haste

Deborah Casale and Sacha Sokhi look at the lessons from a recent sex discrimination case in which two male directors successfully claimed they were dismissed to improve their employer’s gender pay gap.

Since 2017, if you are an employer who has a headcount of 250 or more, you must comply with regulations on gender pay gap reporting. Due to the effects of the pandemic, the Equality and Human Rights Commission has announced that the deadline for gender pay gap reporting has been pushed back to 5 October 2021 for the 2020/21 reporting year.

However, a recent employment tribunal case has seen an employer under fire and subjected to claims of sex discrimination for its attempts to reduce its gender pay gap. In this article, we explore what happened in the case and what steps employers can take to reduce their gender pay gap lawfully.

Facts of the case

Bayfield v Wunderman Thompson [2021] concerned an advertising agency which in 2018 published a high gender pay gap of 44.7%. At a diversity conference later that year, two of the agency’s directors gave a presentation addressing its reputation as a “Knightsbridge boys’ club’ and its desire to improve its gender pay reporting figures. The presentation was accompanied by a slide referring to ‘white, British, privileged, straight men’, with the text struck through. The speaker said the firm’s reputation as being full of these types of employees had to be ‘obliterated’.

The claimants, Chas Bayfield and Dave Jenner, both white men in their fifties, complained to HR that the presentation showed bias against heterosexual white men and that they feared for their jobs. Later that month, the two men were included in a redundancy selection pool of all the creative directors and they were subsequently dismissed on the grounds of redundancy. 

Mr Bayfield and Mr Jenner brought claims at the employment tribunal stating that their complaints amounted to a protected act under the Equality Act 2010 and to a protected disclosure under the whistleblowing legislation contained in the Employment Rights Act 1996. Furthermore, they complained that they were subjected to unlawful detriments and discrimination on grounds of their race, age, sex and sexuality, that they were harassed and victimised and that their dismissals were automatically unfair and discriminatory.

The agency’s case was that it decided to make two of its creative directors redundant in January 2018, before the complaints. However, there was no evidence to support this and the decision was, in any event, superseded by a proposal in March 2018 to make no creative directors redundant.

During the tribunal hearing, Mr Peon, executive creative director and the second respondent, accepted that he had asked for one creative director to be removed from the potential pool for redundancies. He had done this because, although she had the lowest score in the previous redundancy pool selection matrix, he wanted to save her from redundancy as she was a woman.

Tribunal decision

The employment tribunal acknowledged that the desire to improve diversity was a legitimate response to the gender pay gap report and falling revenue. Nevertheless, it found the redundancy selection process to be a sham designed to implement the predetermined decision to dismiss the claimants.

The tribunal therefore found that Mr Bayfield and Mr Jenner had been unfairly dismissed and discriminated against due to their sex. Their claims of harassment and victimisation also succeeded in part.

In the tribunal’s view, there was overwhelming evidence of direct discrimination arising from the claimant’s complaints about the conference. These complaints put them in the firing line during the subsequent redundancy process. The tribunal stated that:

Regardless of the reason, the [redundancy] proposal arose after their complaint and was sealed by 23 May…There was fury at the claimants – and this is at the forefront of their mind. There is a 2nd thought process – 2 birds – dismissing the claimants deals with the issue of reputation also.

However, the tribunal dismissed the claims of automatic unfair dismissal on the grounds of whistleblowing. It found that the claimants’ emails did not amount to protected disclosures as they were saying that in the future their right not to be discriminated against might be breached, but without any information about how this was or would be the case. The claims of race, age and sexual orientation discrimination were also dismissed.

When is positive action lawful?

While many employers will have a legitimate desire to improve their gender pay gap, this case illustrates that doing so in a way that goes beyond taking positive action may risk claims of sex discrimination.

Section 158 of the Equality Act permits an employer to take action to compensate for disadvantages that it reasonably believes are faced by people who share a particular protected characteristic.

An employer can take any action provided that it is a proportionate means of achieving the aim of:

·        enabling or encouraging people who share a protected characteristic to overcome or minimise a disadvantage that they face;

·        meeting the needs of people who share a protected characteristic; or

·        enabling or encouraging people who share a protected characteristic to participate in an activity.

Meanwhile, s159 of the Equality Act can be used in a tie-break situation in recruitment. Where two or more candidates are as qualified as one another, this provision allows an employer to recruit one candidate with a protected characteristic over the others.

Employers have to proceed carefully, especially when using s159, as can be seen from Furlong v Chief Constable of Cheshire Police [2019]. Mr Furlong won his sex discrimination claim at the employment tribunal after he was unsuccessful at an interview for a new intake of police constables. The force had relied on the tie-break provision under s159 to assess all 127 applicants to be of equal merit. It therefore went on to appoint all black and ethnic minority, female, gay and disabled applicants. Given the lack of scoring and the evidence that some had performed better than others, this blanket approach was found to be discriminatory.

If an employer is going to invoke the provisions of s158 or s159 of the Equality Act, it needs to ensure that there is a detailed paper trail with clear implementation considerations and regular review of the policy. The difference between positive action and direct discrimination is subtle and employers should take advice and proceed with caution when using these provisions.

Practical steps

How then can employers lawfully take steps to reduce their gender pay gap?

Balanced interview panels

Interviewers can be trained in reducing unconscious bias and in the principles of diverse recruitment. However, to minimise the risk of male managers recruiting in their own image, it is also important to have a mix of women and men on the interview panel.

Mentoring schemes

Mentoring that is aimed at disadvantaged groups, such as those returning to the workplace after maternity leave, will assist in developing a diverse workforce and identifying ways to tackle the gender pay gap. Reciprocal mentoring benefits not just the mentee but helps the mentor to understand the organisation’s culture towards women and scope for change.

Diversity managers

Employers could appoint a diversity manager whose role is to implement and review steps to improve the gender pay gap. If an organisation is too small to appoint a dedicated diversity manager, a diversity task force of existing employees could be created.

Networking

As with mentoring, targeted networking opportunities for female employees or those returning from maternity leave will help to break down barriers to women returning to work or progressing through the organisation. In turn, this will assist in narrowing the gender pay gap.

Pay reviews and promotions

Clear criteria for reviewing pay and making promotions that factor in periods of maternity leave would ensure that women are not pushed back a year in pay or seniority each time they take maternity leave. Benchmarking or job evaluation schemes are also beneficial to ensure men and women receive the same pay for the same or equivalent work or work of equal value and to avoid equal pay claims.

Flexible working

Commitment to flexible working, backed up by clear guidance and support, would encourage women to stay with an organisation and enable them to progress to roles which reflect their skills and seniority.

This article was first published in Employment Law Journal (October 2021) and is also available on lawjournals.co.uk

 

Contact us today

To talk about your situation

Prefer not to call?

Use our form

This data will only be used by Irwin Mitchell for processing your query and for no other purpose.

Key Contact

Deborah Casale
Deborah Casale
Regional Lead Partner, London
07717 801 848 07717 801 848 Email Deborah

Press Contact

Karen Roberts
Karen Roberts
PR Consultant
07917 225 383 07917 225 383 Email Karen
  • Contact
  • 0808 291 3524
  • Contact Irwin Mitchell
  • Social Media
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • About Irwin Mitchell
  • About Us
  • Responsible Business
  • Careers
  • Business Management
  • Alumni Programme
  • Pay A Bill
  • Complaints Procedure
  • SRA Regulated
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy & Security
  • Hoaxes
  • Modern Slavery Act Statement
  • Manage Cookie Settings

© 2025  Irwin Mitchell LLP

Irwin Mitchell LLP is authorised & regulated in England and Wales by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
Irwin Mitchell Scotland LLP is a Scottish legal practise separate to the Irwin Mitchell Group and regulated by the Law Society of Scotland.
Our Regulatory Information

Dialog that contains a form to request a callback.

Request A Callback

Enter you details below and we'll call you back, at a time of your choice

1000 characters remaining

Preferred date*
Today
Tomorrow

This data will only be used by Irwin Mitchell for processing your query and for no other purpose.