Workers affected by coronavirus can carry over holiday into the next two leave years

featured image

On Friday, the government published Regulations which amend the Working Time Regulations 1998 and allow up to four weeks leave to be carried over into subsequent leave years.

31.03.2020

Ordinarily, workers can only carry over leave from one year to the next if they are too ill to take it. But, in the context of coronavirus and the extraordinary measures being taken to tackle it, the government has extended this exception. 

Now, if it's not "reasonably practicable" for a worker to take some or all the leave as a result of coronavirus, they can carry it over for up to two years from the end of the leave year in which it accrued. So, workers' whose leave years are 1 January to 31 December, have until 31 December 2022 to take up to four weeks leave they haven't taken this year.

What does reasonably practicable mean in this context?

This is widely drawn and applies where coronavirus has affected the worker, their employer, the wider economy or society. 

Do the Regulations apply to all sectors?

Yes, these Regulations apply to any worker/employer but we anticipate that they will be particularly important for businesses and organisations providing products and services linked to the coronavirus response (which appears to be the government's intention - see press release). Health care professionals are an obvious example, but manufactures of PPE, hygiene products and ventilators etc will also need to maintain production at a time when they are likely to have fewer staff because of the rules on self isolation - as will supermarkets and food manufacturers. Employers will therefore be able to cancel pre-booked holiday and refuse new requests (providing they provide proper notice - see our FAQ's) without worrying too much about rescheduling leave this year. 

That said, a couple of issues spring to mind:

  1. Employers still owe their staff a duty to look after their health and well-being. Staff need to take time out from work for "rest and relaxation" - particularly if they are providing front line services and are under intense pressures.  Where possible, they should be encouraged to take at least a week off without coming into work - rather than an odd day here and there to help them wind down and recover.
  2. Once the immediate dangers have passed and business and people start to get back to normal, many people will want (and will probably need) to take a proper break away. You might want to prioritise requests of staff who have worked during the pandemic and those who have shielded themselves in accordance with government guidance (anyone shielding is told not to leave the house for any reason other than to attend urgent medical appointments - and they'll be sicker than most of the sight of the four walls they are living in).   

Can staff cancel holiday and elect to take it when holiday destinations re-open?

Not unless you agree. Holiday doesn't have to be enjoyable, or taken away from home - it just needs to be a period away from work. 

If your business has been adversely affected by the lock-down provisions, you'll want to get up and running as quickly as possible when the UK is open for business once more. To do that you'll probably need the majority of your staff to be available. One option is to limit the amount of holiday someone will have later in the year by asking them to take some of it now when there's no or a reduced amount of work for them to do. If you are furloughing staff, they may be happy to do this - particularly if you are not topping up their salaries because during any holiday period, they must receive their 'normal' pay including overtime, allowances etc. 

However, forcing your staff to take holiday now when there's nothing to do and no-where to go, won't be popular for everyone, so if that's your strategy, it's best to explain to them why you need to do it. If you can avoid it, don't ask your staff to take all of their holiday during the lock-down because at the end of all this, we are all going to need a proper break.

Our coronavirus updates

We're working hard to keep you up to date with legal developments around coronavirus. We've set up a portal which includes lots of helpful articles and advice to help you.

If you have a query, that we haven't answered, please contact us.   

Key Contacts

Related Articles

  • What are the risks of using fixed-term contracts once six month unfair dismissal rights come into force?
    Expert Comment
    What are the risks of using fixed-term contracts once six month unfair dismissal rights come into force?
    Many businesses engage staff on fixed or limited-term contracts to provide cover for staff on family-related leave, absent due to long-term ill-health, or to complete a specific project or task. Some contracts set out the date they are due to end, other set out the specific circumstances that will bring them to an end.
  • Equal pay shake-up: you may soon have to tell job applicants how much you are going to pay them before interview
    Expert Comment
    Equal pay shake-up: you may soon have to tell job applicants how much you are going to pay them before interview
    The government has launched a consultation on plans to reform equal pay laws and strengthen protection against pay discrimination.
  • Flawed investigation costs employer over £115k
    Expert Comment
    Flawed investigation costs employer over £115k
    In Griffiths v Essex County Council, the EAT had to decide whether a tribunal had correctly awarded a disabled employee substantial compensation after she resigned following a flawed and protracted investigation, grievance and appeal process.

Recognised for excellence. Chosen for care.

  • Legal 500 Top Tier Firm UK 202
  • alt tzt
  • Sunday Times Best Places to Work 2025