Coronavirus: SSP payable from day one
The Prime Minister has announced that workers who fall ill with coronavirus or who are advised to self isolate will be entitled to receive statutory sick pay from the first day of their illness or isolation.
04.03.2020
Currently, SSP is payable from the fourth day of absence. It's paid at a fixed rate of £92.25 per week (increasing to £95.85 from 6 April 2020) and is only payable if someone earns at least £118 per week.
The lower earnings limit means that many people are excluded from receiving SSP - particularly if they work on zero hours contracts. The Prime Minister has said that workers who don't qualify for SSP "will be entitled to help through existing systems such as universal credit and we are urgently looking at the application process to reflect on the advice on self-isolation."
We understand that the government is going to introduce emergency legislation to make the changes which, we think, will only apply to coronavirus - not to other conditions or illnesses.
We'll keep you updated.
Boris Johnson said people who self-isolate are helping to protect others from the virus and should not be "penalised for doing the right thing".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51738837
Key Contacts
Related Articles
Expert CommentUnderstanding the Equality Act 2010: EHRC updates its guidance for schools and collegesNew guidance for schools
Expert CommentThe SEND White Paper: our viewThe Government’s SEND White Paper aims to create a more inclusive and streamlined system. While we welcome that ambition, the proposals raise important practical concerns about how the system will work in practice.
Expert CommentGender neutral toilets in primary school breached regulations and indirectly discriminated against girlsIn DE and FG v West Lothian Council the parents of a five-year old girl brought judicial proceedings against a Scottish local authority because the toilet facilities in one of its newly built schools were gender-neutral. They argued the council had breached relevant regulations and its toilet policy indirectly discriminated against girls. They also alleged that the effect of the policy harassed their daughter.
