Mathieu Culverhouse

One of the most rewarding aspects of my career has been acting in cases that have helped shape the law around mental capacity, best interests and serious medical treatment.

Notable examples include Briggs v Briggs and the Tafida Raqeeb case. In Briggs v Briggs, I acted for Lindsey Briggs, the wife of former police officer Paul Briggs, in the landmark Court of Protection proceedings concerning end-of-life decision-making. The Court ultimately accepted Mrs Briggs' position that withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment was consistent with Mr Briggs' wishes, feelings, beliefs and values.

The judgment is widely regarded as a leading authority on the weight to be given to a person's own wishes when determining best interests under the Mental Capacity Act.

I also acted for Tafida Raqeeb and her family in their highly-publicised case concerning proposed withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and her transfer to Italy for ongoing care. The case raised complex issues over medical ethics, parental rights, and the jurisdiction of the courts. We successfully secured the family's objective of ensuring that Tafida could be transferred to Italy for continued treatment, an outcome which attracted significant national and international attention and highlighted the importance of respecting differing views about best interests and medical treatment.

I’ve acted in numerous leading Court of Protection and serious medical treatment cases over the past decade, including high-profile matters before the Supreme Court and Court of Protection that have contributed to the development of the law on deprivation of liberty, medical treatment, end-of-life decisions and capacity.

As joint head of our Court of Protection team and a former national co-chair of the Court of Protection Practitioners Association, I regularly advise individuals, families, public bodies and the Official Solicitor in cases involving some of the most complex and sensitive welfare issues before the courts.

I take the time to understand each client’s individual circumstances, objectives and what matters most to them. From there, I develop a strategy that’s tailored to their specific objectives, based on strong evidence and clear legal advice to build the strongest possible case.

Clients can expect honest advice and regular communication and support throughout what is often a difficult and emotional process. My experience in many of the leading Court of Protection and serious medical treatment cases enables me to identify the key issues early, anticipate challenges, and present the most persuasive case possible.

Whether through negotiation or litigation, my focus is always on achieving the best outcome for my clients while still making sure their rights and interests are protected.

Our first meeting is a chance for you to talk about your situation and what you’re looking to achieve. I recognise how speaking to a solicitor at such an emotional time can be daunting, which is why I always aim to give reassurance and compassion to all my clients throughout the time we work together.

The first meeting can take place by telephone, video call or in person, depending on what’s most convenient and accessible for you. During our first meeting, I’ll listen carefully to your circumstances, explain the relevant legal framework and advise you of the options available.

I’ll also outline the likely next steps. This includes timescales and funding options so that you have a clear understanding of how your case is likely to move forward.

If you decide to instruct me, I’ll work with you to develop a strategy tailored to your objectives. I’ll source the evidence needed to support your case and ensure you receive practical advice and support throughout the process.