Call us on
0370 1500 100
I joined Irwin Mitchell’s Public Law & Human Rights department in 2006 and was made a Partner in 2013. I act for individuals, charities and companies in the full range of judicial review cases, with particular specialisms in the law on consultation, in health and social care, mental capacity and human rights law.
In October 2014, I won the first Supreme Court case in relation to the law on consultation (Moseley), which ruled that all public authorities need to improve how they consult with local people. I was also instructed to intervene on behalf of national charities (Age UK, SENSE, RNIB and Guide Dogs for the Blind) in two of the leading Supreme Court community care cases in recent years as well as having successfully brought judicial review proceedings in a number of High Court and Court of Appeal cases.
I have acted in numerous commercial judicial review cases, protecting the rights of companies that are affected by decisions made by public authorities.
I am also regularly instructed by the Official Solicitor as well as families and advocates to act on behalf of vulnerable adults who lack capacity to make decisions regarding their health and welfare in proceedings in the Court of Protection, and was invited to give evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to help consider the effectiveness and adequacy of the law as well as access to justice for vulnerable individuals.
Notable cases include:
"Alex Rook is excellent, and an expert in his field of public law." - Chambers & Partners, 2019
Alex is a "sharp operator" with "huge amount of expertise"; "a really strong and well-respected lawyer." "His advice was very practical" and he is "good at spotting interesting new areas and pushing the boundaries of public law in the right way". "Completely unflappable and incredibly efficient."
– Chambers & Partners, 2017
"A very classy litigator, who is strategic and understated in a way which is effective" and according to sources is "Brilliant, connected superbly and hugely respected" - Chambers & Partners 2016
"Extremely able in the fields of social care and public law."- Legal 500 2018/19
Combines a "brilliant strategic legal mind with the ability to relate to clients from all walks of life" - Legal 500 2016
"'First rate' for community care, mental capacity and human rights law" - Legal 500, 2017
My inspiration to become a lawyer, and in particular a public law solicitor, came from the combination of the academic challenge it presents and the high level of client contact. I have not been disappointed. (In truth, I was also told from a young age that I was so argumentative that I should be a lawyer!)
Working with disadvantaged people to ensure that their rights are protected.
The quality of work in the Public Law & Human Rights department is pretty much unrivalled nationwide. Every day brings new challenges and keeps me passionate about my work and the changes we can make to people's lives through enforcing their legal rights.
Spend time with my wife and two children. I am a passionate Spurs fan and try to get to watch them as often as possible, and am just about managing to keep my own amateur football career going!
“We have heard many first-hand accounts about how parents feel side-lined and powerless to help their children when they turn 18.
“The parents have the best interests of their children at heart and, having done what’s best for them during their childhood, want to be able to continue this. They are, in reality, the experts in relation to their own children’s views and wishes.
“Of course we accept that the court will need to make decisions on the facts of each particular case, but our clients believe this should be focussed on the young adult’s views and wishes and their best interests, without having to show that their application is ‘one of the most difficult’ as the Code currently requires.”
“We are hopeful that the courts look favourably on the parents’ case.”
This is a hugely important case which will have a major impact on great number of families across the UK.
“With cohabitation on the rise, the issue as to whether unmarried parents should be able to access vital financial support following the death of a partner is clearly a vital one, and the National Children’s Bureau is delighted that the Supreme Court has today recognised that children should not suffer a disadvantage just because their parents chose not to marry.
“We are proud to have lent our support to the National Children’s Bureau and are delighted at the Supreme Court’s judgment.”
Daniel’s family has always maintained that deaf children such as Daniel should be able to achieve a GCSE in BSL – his first language.
“We are delighted that the Government has backed down from its original position as, at present, the lack of a BSL GCSE is having a major and unnecessary impact on thousands of children each year.
“It is only right that any qualification should meet rigorous testing criteria set by the Department for Education. However, this announcement is a major turning point and hopefully paves the way so children such as Daniel have access to the education they deserve.”
The Government has on several occasions said its current policy is to offer a period of stability to schools following other changes and therefore no new GCSE’s are being introduced at this time.
“However, we feel that the delay and ultimate failure to introduce a BSL qualification amounts to a breach of a number of legal duties and that this issue requires urgent attention.
“It is simply not right that thousands of deaf children across the UK are unable to achieve a GCSE in their first language.”
Request A Call Back
Enter your details below and we'll call you back, at a time of your choice.
This data will only be used by Irwin Mitchell for processing your query and for no other purpose.