This website uses cookies for functionality and allow us to analyse the use of the site. To opt out please view our cookie policy. If you continue to browse the site, we'll assume you agree to the use of cookies.
Call us on
0370 1500 100
I am a Partner and a Chartered Legal Executive within the family law team in Sheffield. I assist Martin Loxley with complex high asset ancillary relief cases. My role also involves dealing with divorce and financial issues arising from divorce. Children's disputes including acting for parents and grandparents in applications under section 8 of Children Act. I have specialised in dealing with matrimonial affairs since 1993.
Part of the work is now dealing with pre and post separation agreements for couples who are not married.
"Thank you. I remain indebted to you for your kindness and professionalism throughout my journey - one that I wish I had not had to take, but your assistance definitely made it more manageable." - Client
Sources commend her ability to find a "sensible way to resolve matters." - Chambers & Partners 2018
Zoe is "very down to earth and practical" - Chambers & Partners 2017
Zoe is "committed" - Legal 500 2016
I really enjoy meeting people and the idea of helping others through difficult times has always been very rewarding to me.
Ensuring that my clients feel that their case has been heard properly and presented appropriately. Feeling as though people have a simple explanation of the rights and responsibilities they have during the breakdown of their marriage or relationship.
The expanse of knowledge throughout the firm, all of which is on hand to assist when required. The building itself, the client meeting areas and facilities for clients. The restaurant is lovely as are the staff and the environment is an overall bonus.
I like to socialise with friends in bars and restaurants. Getting dressed up is always good for a laugh. I watch my son play football and shout a lot on the touchline.
“We are delighted that our client’s children had their wishes heard and will be allowed to stay with their mother. Throughout the case the children were considered to be ‘Gillick competent’, i.e. sufficiently mature enough to give legal instructions themselves, which made it all the more difficult when their wishes were not taken into account - to their and their mother’s considerable distress. “Our client was subject to a return order and it was essential that this be set-aside. The case has helped to clarify the powers available to the High Court in these circumstances. “Children should not be coerced nor have their wishes ignored by adults in the courts if they are deemed mature enough to express their own opinion. We’re very lucky that we were able to avoid such a scenario happening in this case, and hope that similar situations will follow our path in determining whether a child’s express wish is being properly conveyed. “It’s always a sad event when a family unit breaks up, but the best interests of the children are front and centre for every judge in this situation. Trying to negatively sway the judge into believing a false reality is something every lawyer should be actively guarding against, at the risk of tearing apart formerly amicable family relations.”
"The rise in older people divorcing has been a trend for the past few years and reflects that fact that divorce is no longer the stigma it once was. In general, attitudes have changed towards relationships and divorce. The older generation have realised that they can separate, often amicably, and still meet new people and lead a more enriched life rather than staying in relationships which may be making them unhappy. Social Media is also helping to open up new ways of finding others and developing new hobbies, interests and partnerships. “People in their 30s are more likely to be cohabiting than others partly because of attitudes to marriage but also because finances have been squeezed for many during the past 6 years when traditionally they would have been paying for their weddings. “With more older divorcees, it also comes as no surprise to see more older couple’s cohabiting too. They may be starting new relationships but don’t feel that marriage is right for them. With people living longer lives the current generation of people over 60 and 70 will inevitably be setting new trends in how they live. “What cohabitants need to understand is that there is no such thing as a common law partner and that they may not have the rights they think they do in the event of any separation. ‘Living Together Agreements’ can help to set some boundaries in relationships. While it won’t help them organise the washing up rota or schedule date nights, it is legally binding if it deals with shared interests in property such as the home, furniture, cars and other valuable assets. "Sorting out break-ups for unmarried couples can be costly because unlike divorce there is no straightforward legal framework to help decide how they may share assets after any potential split."
"The court is very reluctant to allow a former husband or wife to reopen financial arrangements following a divorce where there is a final order. There are strong public policy reasons for finality so that people can rely upon what has been decided by the court and move on with their lives. "However in very limited circumstances the court will set aside an order, such as where there has been material fraud or if there has been a new event which was unforeseen at the time and which undermines the entire basis of the original financial order. "It is very rare that a court will allow an appeal because of a supervening event. These are known to family lawyers as Barder events, after a case where tragically a wife killed herself and her children shortly after an order had been made which was based around providing a home for them. "However, if Mr Davison’s physical health was a known quantity at the time of the trial, it is unlikely the effect of his death would be a Barder event. "Other changes of circumstance such as the increase or decrease in property or share values have not been considered by the court to provide sufficient reason for an order to be revisited."
"The reports on this case hint at a separating couple putting their differences aside in order to reach the best outcome not only for themselves, but also more importantly for their children. "Divorce is an emotionally difficult and stressful time for everyone involved – including the children – and we would always encourage couples to consider all options when it comes to formalising their separation, with an emphasis on ensuring that they work together. "Alternative dispute resolution approaches such as mediation and collaborative law can help in this regard, as they allow parties to sit down with trained and qualified professionals who can assist them in making key decisions about finances and access to children in a constructive way. "For many, divorce often equals costly and time-consuming court battles and while those who have experienced a difficult break-up may be left with little option but to go down that route, there are alternatives for those who are in a position to work together."
Request A Call Back
Enter your details below and we'll call you back, at a time of your choice.
Preferred date*
This data will only be used by Irwin Mitchell for processing your query and for no other purpose.