Call us on
0370 1500 100
I am a Partner in the Public Law and Human Rights Department at Irwin Mitchell and head up our national Education Law team.
I specialise in education law, community care and healthcare (including medical treatment) and Court of Protection. I have a particular interest in cases involving the rights of children and young people with disabilities.
My education law practice includes acting for parents in appeals to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal and judicial reviews on a range of public law issues such as school closure, transport, failure to provide education and wider policy challenges. I also advise schools and colleges in relation to a broad range of legal issues including duties under the Equality Act, admissions and exclusions, funding and governance and challenges against local authorities’ decision-making.
In the Court of Protection, I am experienced in representing individuals who lack capacity where there are disputes about best interests, often on instruction of the Official Solicitor or an independent mental capacity advocate (“IMCA”). I have acted in a number of reported cases in relation to deprivation of liberty and breaches of human rights including cases which involve cross border issues with other legal jurisdictions such as Scotland.
In September 2015 I was appointed as a member of the Law Society’s Mental Health and Disability Committee and I am a contributing author to the LAG publication “Disabled Children: A legal Handbook” (2nd edition) co-writing both the remedies and education law chapters.
I was named Solicitor of the Year at the Bristol Law Society Awards in 2014 and was a shortlisted finalist at the National Law Society Excellence Awards in 2015. I was also named Assistant/Associate Solicitor of the Year in the Birmingham Law Society Awards in 2011 and was a shortlisted finalist at the 2009 Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year Awards.
An "outstanding solicitor... she's really tenacious and gets good results." - Chambers & Partners 2018
Her commitment to protecting the rights of disabled children and adults is obvious. She works 24/7 to get the right outcome and is not afraid to take on complicated and challenging cases, providing a clear voice in the often chaotic world of SEN and public law. - Chambers & Partners 2017
Polly "commands huge respect in management of Court of Protection cases and her contributions to the law" - Legal 500, 2017
Polly Sweeney is an "amazingly talented claimant lawyer" - Legal 500 2016
Polly is "exceptional" and displays "outstanding client care skills" - Legal 500 2014
“We are pleased that the council has agreed to keep the MET base in Redditch open and children will be able to continue to attend from the start of the new term pending a proper consultation which will allow parents and children to contribute to the decision making process.
“The Redditch MET base provides an important service to children locally and the decision to close without any notice has caused many families considerable worry and anxiety over the summer.
“We hope that the council will now work with the families to ensure that the right decision is reached in relation to the future of the base”.
“The High Court has confirmed today that local authorities should not be criminalising unauthorised holidays in term time by alleging that there is a failure to regularly attend school simply by looking at the period of holiday absence.
“When looking at whether attendance is regular, local authorities should consider the “wider picture” including overall attendance record. In this case, a 93% attendance record was sufficient.
“The ruling will have significant implications across the country for local authorities who will no longer be able to prosecute parents simply for taking children on unauthorised holidays during school time when the child otherwise has good attendance at school.
“The decision clearly raises serious questions in relation to the current practice of issuing fixed penalty notices and I anticipate that there will now be many more parents refusing to pay these fines.
“What is clear is that there needs to be much greater clarity on this issue for all concerned – in particular for Head Teachers and Schools who will still be left only being able to authorise absences in exceptional circumstances.”
It is incredibly worrying to see such postcode lottery concerns emerge in relation to the support and specialist help that children with special educational needs are able to access.
"The level of support available should never be determined by where a family lives, so it is safe to say there are clear questions regarding the processes under taken by local authorities on this issue.
"Consistency is absolutely requisite and we would urge the Government and councils to work together to ensure a fair, quality system is in place which ensures no child is left behind in terms of the help they receive."
We are pleased that the Court has accepted our arguments regarding the lawfulness of the Defendant's Local Offer and hope that this Judgment sends out a message to local authorities that they have to take their new duties introduced under Part 3 of the Children and Families Act 2014 seriously.
“The Court also emphasised the importance of local authorities having a register of disabled children so they can plan properly for budgets and services to support them. However, we are very disappointed that the Court has ruled that disabled children are not automatically entitled to a social care assessment and we are concerned that this Judgment will leave disabled children across the country in a vulnerable position without access to proper assessments.
“We also remain of the view that the Defendant has not consulted properly on its final proposals to limit access to social care services. We intend to apply to renew our application on these grounds to the Court of Appeal.”
Request a call back
Enter your details below and we'll call you back, at a time of your choice.