Free speech law back on the cards for HE ... minus some of its teeth

Insubordinate man with zipped mouth

Last year, the new Education Secretary halted the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 There was some suggestion that the government would revoke the Act in its entirety. It hasn't done that. But it has removed some of the enforcement provisions because it was concerned that HE providers could have incurred “disproportionate and crippling costs” in defending litigation.

04.02.2025

What else is changing?

The government hasn't published an amended version of the legislation yet. However, its press release said that it would scrap “burdensome provisions” including: 

  • The right for staff, students and external speakers to sue HE institutions for damages if their rights had been infringed (the “statutory tort”); 
  • Removing the duty on the Office for Students to investigate complaints - instead they will have a power to do so; and
  • Requiring student unions to take on legal responsibility for ensuring and promoting free speech

And what isn't?

The key components of the original Act will remain. HE providers will have a duty to promote and protect free speech and will have to put in place “a set of policies and values” to reflect this, which will be enforced by the Office for Students.

In addition to the general duty to promote free speech, academic staff will be allowed to question and test received wisdom and to put forward new ideas and controversial or unpopular opinions, without jeopardising their career prospects, having their privileges removed or being dismissed for doing so. 

The government has also said that it will impose a “complete ban” on the use of non-disclosure agreements for victims of bullying, harassment or sexual misconduct. The original Act included similar provisions.  

What role will the Office for Students play?

It will be responsible for enforcing what the government calls a “new workable, robust complaints system”. It will be able to issue fines and penalties. 

Airf Ahmed will remain in post as Director for Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom. 

The Office for Students hasn't updated its website to reflect these developments. However, last year, it published draft guidance relating to freedom of speech which set out a comprehensive list of steps that it might be reasonable for a college to take including those relating to admissions, appointments, employment and promotion. You can read our analysis of this here.

Will the government provide any guidance to help HE understand the new duty?

Yes. It has said that it will provide a Code of Practice.

When will the Act come into force?

The government has indicated that it wants the Act to be up and running by the start of the next academic year (September 2025). That's a year later than the original plan. 

Our newsletters

We publish monthly employment and education newsletters. If you'd like to be added to the mailing list, please let me know. 

The ECHR has welcomed the Secretary of State's announcement: “Freedom of expression in HE should be upheld at every opportunity and should only be limited where there are genuine safety concerns, or where it constitutes unlawful behaviour.”

Key Contacts

Related Articles

  • Belief discrimination: it's not what you say, it's the way that you say it
    Expert Comment
    Belief discrimination: it's not what you say, it's the way that you say it
    When can an employer dismiss a member of staff who says something that is protected as a belief, but offends other people?
  • Don't ask, don't get: EAT clarifies the right to be accompanied
    Expert Comment
    Don't ask, don't get: EAT clarifies the right to be accompanied
    The EAT has considered whether an employee can bring a claim for breach of the duty to be accompanied where he wasn't told about the purpose of the meeting and didn't ask to bring a companion.
  • Do you include a training repayment clause in your contracts of employment?
    Expert Comment
    Do you include a training repayment clause in your contracts of employment?
    The Court of Appeal has for the first time considered whether training cost clawback provisions in employment contracts are in restraint of trade and therefore unenforceable.

Recognised for excellence. Chosen for care.

  • Legal 500 Top Tier Firm UK 202
  • alt tzt
  • Sunday Times Best Places to Work 2025
  • Kings Award Logo
  • ePrivateClient Top Law Firms 2025