Preventing Financial Crime a Top FCA Priority

A businesswoman selecting a Compliance business concept on a futuristic portable computer screen.

On 12 November 2024 the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced they had levied fines of almost £17million on Metro Bank for their failure to have sufficient anti-money laundering procedures in place.

18.11.2024

In 2017 and 2018, junior staff highlighted issues after the 2016 implementation of an automated system for monitoring customer transactions. Although the system was designed to identify questionable transactions, it faced operational difficulties.

Staff recognised that transactions that occurred the day the account was opened were not actually being checked and the delay in Metro Bank rectifying the loophole led to 60 million transactions, involving sums totalling £51billion, not undergoing adequate money laundering checks.

Metro Bank did not resolve the issues around the automated system until July 2019, however they were criticised by the FCA for not consistently checking data until December 2020.

In delivering the fine of £16.7million the FCA said the failings “risked a gap being left in our defence against the criminal misuse of our financial system. Those failings went on for too long”.

Because Metro Bank agreed to resolve the issues, their fine was reduced by 30%, in accordance with FCA rules, from an initial fine of £23.8million.

Garon Anthony, Financial Disputes Partner, comments:

“Preventing financial crime continues to be a top regulatory priority for the FCA. The outcome of this investigation is another clear indicator, following hot on the heels of the FCA’s fine of Starling Bank for failings in their financial crime systems and controls, of the importance for financial institutions of ensuring that their AML processes are robust and effective as the regulatory sanctions for failures to meet these requirements are severe.

“Banks should ensure that whilst seeking to create efficiencies in their systems, they continue to comply with their regulatory obligations, particularly those which are there to prevent financial crime.”

Key Contacts

Related Articles

  • Licensing authorities face a more transparent and more equality-focused operating environment
    Expert Comment
    Licensing authorities face a more transparent and more equality-focused operating environment
    Licensing authorities are entering a period of notable procedural change. While the reforms come from different sources, their combined effect is clear: licensing decisions will need to be more transparent, better evidenced and more accessible to applicants, licence holders and affected communities.What this means in practiceKey takeaways
  • MI5, Agent X and False Evidence to the Courts: MI5’s non-compliance with their Duty of Candour leads to Contempt of Court
    Expert Comment
    MI5, Agent X and False Evidence to the Courts: MI5’s non-compliance with their Duty of Candour leads to Contempt of Court
    “Neither Confirm No Deny” (“NCND”) is a longstanding policy relied upon by intelligence and law enforcement agencies. The rationale is that confirming or denying the identity of informants, intelligence assets or operational methods may, in itself, damage national security.
  • Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026: licensing consultation delayed, but businesses should not wait
    Expert Comment
    Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026: licensing consultation delayed, but businesses should not wait
    One of the most significant public health reforms has been designed to create what the Government describes as a “smoke-free generation” whilst also tightening controls around vaping and nicotine products.

Recognised for excellence. Chosen for care.

  • Legal 500 Top Tier Firm UK 202
  • alt tzt
  • Sunday Times Best Places to Work 2025