Preventing Financial Crime a Top FCA Priority

A businesswoman selecting a Compliance business concept on a futuristic portable computer screen.

On 12 November 2024 the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced they had levied fines of almost £17million on Metro Bank for their failure to have sufficient anti-money laundering procedures in place.

18.11.2024

In 2017 and 2018, junior staff highlighted issues after the 2016 implementation of an automated system for monitoring customer transactions. Although the system was designed to identify questionable transactions, it faced operational difficulties.

Staff recognised that transactions that occurred the day the account was opened were not actually being checked and the delay in Metro Bank rectifying the loophole led to 60 million transactions, involving sums totalling £51billion, not undergoing adequate money laundering checks.

Metro Bank did not resolve the issues around the automated system until July 2019, however they were criticised by the FCA for not consistently checking data until December 2020.

In delivering the fine of £16.7million the FCA said the failings “risked a gap being left in our defence against the criminal misuse of our financial system. Those failings went on for too long”.

Because Metro Bank agreed to resolve the issues, their fine was reduced by 30%, in accordance with FCA rules, from an initial fine of £23.8million.

Garon Anthony, Financial Disputes Partner, comments:

“Preventing financial crime continues to be a top regulatory priority for the FCA. The outcome of this investigation is another clear indicator, following hot on the heels of the FCA’s fine of Starling Bank for failings in their financial crime systems and controls, of the importance for financial institutions of ensuring that their AML processes are robust and effective as the regulatory sanctions for failures to meet these requirements are severe.

“Banks should ensure that whilst seeking to create efficiencies in their systems, they continue to comply with their regulatory obligations, particularly those which are there to prevent financial crime.”

Key Contacts

Related Articles

  • The Ripple Effect of Organised Crime Investigations on Businesses
    Expert Comment
    The Ripple Effect of Organised Crime Investigations on Businesses
    The recent arrest of 17 individuals as part of a large-scale organised crime investigation is notable not simply because of the scale of the police operation, but because it highlights the range of financial and regulatory consequences that can follow when suspected organised crime intersects with legitimate businesses and the financial system.
  • AI Promised Efficiency; Now It Is Creating Commercial Disputes
    Expert Comment
    AI Promised Efficiency; Now It Is Creating Commercial Disputes
    Artificial intelligence has moved from boardroom discussion to business reality at remarkable speed. Organisations of all sizes are using AI tools to streamline operations, analyse data, assist in decision making, improve customer service and enhance productivity.
  • PSC Compliance: Why accuracy matters more than ever
    Expert Comment
    PSC Compliance: Why accuracy matters more than ever
    The UK’s people with significant control (“PSC”) regime was introduced to make corporate ownership more transparent. In simple terms, companies need to understand who ultimately owns or controls them, record that information properly, and ensure that Companies House is kept up to date when things change.The legal frameworkA stronger focus on register integrityWhere the risks tend to ariseHow companies can reduce the riskWhat this means in practice

Recognised for excellence. Chosen for care.

  • Legal 500 Top Tier Firm UK 202
  • alt tzt
  • Sunday Times Best Places to Work 2025
  • Kings Award Logo
  • ePrivateClient Top Law Firms 2025