Furlough - up to £3.5bn could have been wrongly paid out (so far)
Yesterday, the Chief Executive at HMRC, Jim Harra gave evidence to the Public Accounts Committee about 'tackling the tax gap'. He was asked about the furlough scheme and said that HMRC were working on the assumption that the error and fraud rate could be between 5% and 10%. On current figures, that means that somewhere between £1.75bn and £3.5bn could have been wrongly claimed. And, of course those figures are likely to increase as the scheme still has two months left to run.
08.09.2020
Mr Harra said that HMRC would concentrate its efforts on finding those businesses that have deliberately over-claimed, but he didn't say how much, he believes the government has lost to fraud rather than to mistake.
As we reported last month, businesses are now expected to check their records to make sure their claims are accurate. If you've claimed more than you should have, you have 90 days to notify HMRC. If fail to do so and are caught, you can be fined and named and shamed in a public register. More details are available here.
Our Coronavirus updates
We're working hard to keep you up to date with legal developments around Coronavirus. We've set up a portal which includes lots of helpful articles and advice to help you.
If you have a query, that we haven't answered, please contact us.
By 16 August, 9.6 million people had been put on government-supported furlough, with 1.2 million employers claiming the support.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/sep/07/up-to-35bn-furlough-scheme-cash-may-have-been-wrongly-paid-out
Key Contacts
Related Articles
Expert CommentBelief discrimination: it's not what you say, it's the way that you say itWhen can an employer dismiss a member of staff who says something that is protected as a belief, but offends other people?
Expert CommentDon't ask, don't get: EAT clarifies the right to be accompaniedThe EAT has considered whether an employee can bring a claim for breach of the duty to be accompanied where he wasn't told about the purpose of the meeting and didn't ask to bring a companion.
Expert CommentDo you include a training repayment clause in your contracts of employment?The Court of Appeal has for the first time considered whether training cost clawback provisions in employment contracts are in restraint of trade and therefore unenforceable.
