Coronavirus: new guidance on right to work checks
Our immigration specialist Philip Barth explains how organisations can carry out right to work checks at a time when many workplaces are closed and staff are working from homes.
07.04.2020
As of 30 March 2020 the following temporary changes have been made:
- checks can now be carried out over video calls
- job applicants and existing workers can send scanned documents or a photo of documents for checks using email or a mobile app, rather than sending originals
- employers should use the Employer Checking Service if a prospective or existing employee cannot provide any of the accepted documents
These are only temporary measures and the Home Office will let employers know in advance when they will end. After then the standard existing regime will recommence.
Employers will then have to carry out retrospective checks on existing employees who started, or needed a follow-up check, during these temporary measures.
The retrospective checks must be carried out within 8 weeks of the end of these temporary measures.
The Home Office will not take any enforcement action against employers who have carried out the adjusted checks and followed this up with the retrospective check.
Full details of the guidance can be found here.
Need help?
If you have any questions about these measures or any other sponsorship or immigration compliance matter, please contact one of our specialist immigration lawyers.
Key Contacts
Related Articles
Expert CommentUnderstanding the Equality Act 2010: EHRC updates its guidance for schools and collegesNew guidance for schools
Expert CommentThe SEND White Paper: our viewThe Government’s SEND White Paper aims to create a more inclusive and streamlined system. While we welcome that ambition, the proposals raise important practical concerns about how the system will work in practice.
Expert CommentGender neutral toilets in primary school breached regulations and indirectly discriminated against girlsIn DE and FG v West Lothian Council the parents of a five-year old girl brought judicial proceedings against a Scottish local authority because the toilet facilities in one of its newly built schools were gender-neutral. They argued the council had breached relevant regulations and its toilet policy indirectly discriminated against girls. They also alleged that the effect of the policy harassed their daughter.
