Coronavirus: new guidance on right to work checks
Our immigration specialist Philip Barth explains how organisations can carry out right to work checks at a time when many workplaces are closed and staff are working from homes.
07.04.2020
As of 30 March 2020 the following temporary changes have been made:
- checks can now be carried out over video calls
- job applicants and existing workers can send scanned documents or a photo of documents for checks using email or a mobile app, rather than sending originals
- employers should use the Employer Checking Service if a prospective or existing employee cannot provide any of the accepted documents
These are only temporary measures and the Home Office will let employers know in advance when they will end. After then the standard existing regime will recommence.
Employers will then have to carry out retrospective checks on existing employees who started, or needed a follow-up check, during these temporary measures.
The retrospective checks must be carried out within 8 weeks of the end of these temporary measures.
The Home Office will not take any enforcement action against employers who have carried out the adjusted checks and followed this up with the retrospective check.
Full details of the guidance can be found here.
Need help?
If you have any questions about these measures or any other sponsorship or immigration compliance matter, please contact one of our specialist immigration lawyers.
Key Contacts
Related Articles
Expert CommentBelief discrimination: it's not what you say, it's the way that you say itWhen can an employer dismiss a member of staff who says something that is protected as a belief, but offends other people?
Expert CommentDon't ask, don't get: EAT clarifies the right to be accompaniedThe EAT has considered whether an employee can bring a claim for breach of the duty to be accompanied where he wasn't told about the purpose of the meeting and didn't ask to bring a companion.
Expert CommentDo you include a training repayment clause in your contracts of employment?The Court of Appeal has for the first time considered whether training cost clawback provisions in employment contracts are in restraint of trade and therefore unenforceable.
