
Business Interruption Insurance - Permission to Appeal Refused

We have commented regularly on the business interruption insurance cases following the Covid-19 pandemic as they have made their way through the courts.
20.12.2024
Today, the Supreme Court has refused permission for Allianz to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of London International Exhibition Centre plc v Allianz Insurance Plc [2024] EWCA Civ 1026.
Garon Anthony, Financial Services Partner comments:
"Todays’ decision by the Supreme Court is a welcome early Christmas present for business interruption insurance policyholders who have “at the premises” disease clause in their policies and who have previously had their claims rejected by insurers for coverage reasons.
Many policyholders who are across these issues, and aware that they had such clauses in their policies, can now finally pursue their claims against insurers. But other policyholders who had claims rejected in the past on the coverage grounds advanced by insurers in the ExCel case, and who have not been following legal developments, would be well advised to go back and check their BI policies to see if the Court’s decision could allow them to re-open the claim and re- engage with insurers.”
Key Contacts


Related Articles
Expert CommentFraud in the Digital Age: what the independent review means for victims of fraudFraud continues to evolve at a remarkable pace. As technology becomes increasingly embedded in everyday life, fraudsters are finding new ways to exploit businesses and individuals through online scams, cyber-enabled deception, investment fraud and sophisticated impersonation techniques.
Expert CommentConsumer Duty moves from supervision to enforcementNew publication provides insight on Consumer Duty
Expert CommentFCA consultation on penalty decision-making: practical implications for firmsOn 15 June 2026, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) published a new consultation (“the Consultation”) proposing targeted reforms to how financial penalties are assessed and applied in enforcement cases when the FCA has concluded that its rules have been broken by regulated firms or individuals .


