Supreme Court's decision on term-time working holiday case due on Wednesday 20 July
Next week, the Supreme Court will hand down its judgment in the long-running case of Harpur Trust v Brazel.
15.07.2022
The issue in dispute is whether an employee engaged to work part of the year on permanent contracts is entitled to at least 5.6 weeks' statutory holiday, or if a pro-rated allowance to reflect the number of weeks they actually work.
Why this case matters
This decision will impact many employers, particularly those in the education sector, who engage lots of staff on term-time only contracts. Many have pro-rated their holiday entitlement to reflect the number of weeks they work each year (usually 39, compared to 46.5 weeks for a full-time employee) and, as the law currently, stands may have underpaid staff.
The decision of the Supreme Court should provide certainty.
We'll keep you posted.
Our newsletters
We publish monthly employment newsletters. If you'd like to be added to the mailing list, please let me know.
Our fixed price employment law service
We also have a fixed price employment law service. Please contact Gordon Rodham if you'd like to find out how we can help you avoid these sorts of problems with our fixed-fee annual retainer, or flexible discounted bank of hours service.
Key Contacts
Related Articles
Expert CommentBelief discrimination: it's not what you say, it's the way that you say itWhen can an employer dismiss a member of staff who says something that is protected as a belief, but offends other people?
Expert CommentDon't ask, don't get: EAT clarifies the right to be accompaniedThe EAT has considered whether an employee can bring a claim for breach of the duty to be accompanied where he wasn't told about the purpose of the meeting and didn't ask to bring a companion.
Expert CommentDo you include a training repayment clause in your contracts of employment?The Court of Appeal has for the first time considered whether training cost clawback provisions in employment contracts are in restraint of trade and therefore unenforceable.
