Call us on
0370 1500 100
I am a solicitor in the Public Law & Human Rights team, specialising in health and social care, inquests and actions against the police. I joined Irwin Mitchell as a paralegal in 2010 before training and qualifying with the firm.
I am also co-chair of Young Legal Aid Lawyers, a national group of aspiring and junior lawyers which campaigns for access to justice and seeks to promote social mobility and diversity in the legal profession.
I represent disabled adults and children in judicial review proceedings concerning the duties on local authorities and the NHS to provide them with sufficient care and support, including challenges to withdrawal or closure of services and cases under the Equality Act.
I act on behalf of vulnerable adults and their families in health and welfare disputes in the Court of Protection, where the court is asked to decide what is in the best interests of a person who lacks the mental capacity to make decisions for themselves.
I represent families at inquests into the death of a loved one where that death has occurred in police custody, prison, social care or a mental health hospital, or where the death has taken place following contact with the police. I also advise and represent families in claims under the Human Rights Act following deaths where a public body is involved.
I act for clients in actions against the police arising out of wrongful arrest, assault, malicious prosecution, misfeasance in public office and in claims under the Human Rights Act.
“Thank you so much for all you have done. The standard of your work and ability to listen to me, when we needed you, is astounding. You have given my father and I a voice. I have been so stressed out by all of this and so has my father. But we don't feel alone with you on our side.” – Ms E
“I am deeply moved by your quick and efficient response and willingness to help. It gives hope to see even that even when faced with brick walls, there are those who are there provide a ladder and help you up and over.” – Mr N
I write regularly about public law, human rights, legal aid and access to justice for Legal Action, The Justice Gap, Legal Voice and Socialist Lawyer. I have also written for Solicitors Journal, Huffington Post, openDemocracy and the Journal of Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law.
I wanted to use the law to help people who need it most and also, where possible, to effect positive social change. The work we do in the Public Law & Human Rights team can benefit not only our individual clients, but also wider groups in society. For example, while working as a paralegal in the team, I assisted on a successful challenge to the closure of a soup kitchen in Walthamstow (Blake & Others v London Borough of Waltham Forest  EWHC 1027 (Admin)).
It is incredibly rewarding when we are able to successfully challenge unlawful conduct by state bodies in the public interest, but the most important thing is achieving a positive outcome for our clients and protecting their rights.
I work with fantastic colleagues on important cases which can change people’s lives, and throughout the firm the range of expertise we have is unrivalled – whatever legal problem a client has, there is likely to be someone at Irwin Mitchell who knows the answer.
I campaign for legal aid and access to justice as co-chair of Young Legal Aid Lawyers, I volunteer for a homeless charity and I try to run the occasional half-marathon (my single attempt at a marathon to date was not a resounding success). I have also taken part in two successful attempts to break the world record for the longest ever football match. Sadly I think my days as a world record breaking athlete are some way behind me.
"The announcement has caused a great deal of concern to many residents in the area who believe that the decision will harm NHS services.
“Those opposed to the decision would like to work with the clinical commissioning groups to find a solution but so far have been left frustrated by the response.
“Campaigners feel they have no alternative but to start the legal process and so have asked Irwin Mitchell to investigate the legality of the decision and the consultation process.
“We would urge the clinical commissioning groups to enter into talks with campaigners to find a solution agreeable to all parties.”
“The inquest has been a deeply emotional time for Michal’s family. Hearing about his final hours, and reliving their devastating loss has been traumatising and upsetting.
“The jury heard that Michal was looking forward to being released from prison on 7 December 2017, restarting his life in the UK and his relationship with his partner. Unfortunately, he was only told that morning that the Home Office would be detaining him beyond his release date.
“The jury heard that Michal was told he would be removed from the UK, but he is unlikely to have understood that he had a right to appeal the decision to deport him. The documents from the Home Office were only provided to him in English, and the immigration officer who was present in the prison that day did not speak to Michal.
“We know Michal would have found it difficult to access specialist legal advice to appeal against deportation, but with advice from an immigration lawyer he could have proved to the Home Office that he had been living and working in the UK for 12 years and that he should not be deported.
“Tragically, just hours after being told that he wouldn’t be released, Michal jumped from the first floor landing in the prison and suffered a fatal head injury.
“While nothing will change what they have been through, the inquest has raised important points regarding the support Michal was given after he received the paperwork from the Home Office. Hopefully these lessons will be learned not just here but nationally too.
“We will continue to work with Michal’s family, and ensure they receive the support they need.”
“We are delighted to see that Birmingham City Council has reversed its decision to close Fairway Day Centre.
“The centre makes a huge difference to our client, and to the lives of many other vulnerable people in the community. We had significant concerns about the decision-making process by the council, including whether a proper consultation had been undertaken.
“It is very welcome that the local authority has seen sense on this issue and we hope that the centre is able to continue to provide vital support for many years to come.
"This important public interest case has been funded by legal aid, although our client was required to pay a contribution towards the cost from their limited savings. As the council has now conceded the case, it will be responsible for paying our client's legal costs.”
“We are pleased that the High Court has granted the interim relief order which will provide some peace of mind to those who rely on the centre for the time being.
“We are heartened that when granting the interim order, the judge commented that we had a strong case that a full and lawful consultation over the closure was required.
“We once again call on the local authority to listen to the people who use Fairway Day Centre and their families, and reconsider the decision to close this vital service.”
Request A Call Back
Enter your details below and we'll call you back, at a time of your choice.
This data will only be used by Irwin Mitchell for processing your query and for no other purpose.