Our recent work

Severe Head Injury Compensation Following Motorcycle Accident


Motorcycle accident claim for head injury

On 14 December 2003, the Claimant suffered a severe head injury following a motorcycle accident whilst riding as a pillion passenger, driven by the Defendant who was killed in the accident.

It was found out that the Defendant failed to negotiate the junction and mounted a traffic island causing the motorcycle to fall to one side. The motorcycle continued with both riders and then slid along one side of the dual carriageway and continued to slide under the safety barrier. The Defendant’s helmet was knocked off and he suffered fatal injuries in the impact and died at the scene. The Claimant was thrown from the motorcycle across the opposite carriageway and came to rest on the verge.

A compensation claim was issued against the Defendant’s estate in the High Court in London. Liability was initially disputed on the grounds that the claimant knew or ought to have known that the defendant was unfit to drive and on the grounds that he was not wearing a properly fastened helmet.

The Claimant lacked capacity within the meaning of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Negotations with the Defendant led to an offer of £1,350,000 that was made less than a week before the trial. As the Claimant lacked capacity, this settlement was approved at an approval hearing on 12 November 2007


Personal injury compensation

If you have suffered injury, whether at work, on the road or elsewhere, we can offer free advice on whether you are able to pursue a compensation claim.

Fill in our online claims form here for free expert advice.

Press enquiries: Please click here to visit the press office
Related services for you:

This news section contains stories of interest to our clients from publicly available news sources. Where we are representing the clients referred to in the news material we will say so. Where we do not represent individuals or bodies mentioned or quoted, the inclusion of the news story in our news section is not intended nor should it be taken to imply that we act for the individual or body concerned.