0370 1500 100

Melanie Stancliffe



Melanie provides practical employment advice to businesses, directors, partner/members and employees, particularly to clients in the financial services and technology sectors. She has 18 years’ experience in this area and has expertise in negotiating contracts and settlement agreements.

Melanie is Joint Head of the Irwin Mitchell French Group. 

Melanie advises boards on their business structures and throughout reorganisation proceedings. She also assists businesses on making their acquisitions and sales.

She has experience in handling a variety of cases, including:

  • International work
  • Senior Executive departures
  • Unfair dismissals (including disciplinary investigations) and wrongful dismissals
  • Whistle-blowing
  • Equal pay and discrimination claims
  • Restrictive covenant and bonus litigation
  • Settlement agreements

She is ranked as an expert in legal directories Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners. 

Read My Comments On The Latest News

  • 07/07/2017
    Businesses Await Landmark Whistleblowing Court Of Appeal Decision

    “This is a crucial case and many businesses will be keeping a close eye on the outcome, particularly in relation to how many other people must be affected by the subject of a particular disclosure for it to be considered to be in the public interest”.

    Continue Reading
  • 21/07/2016
    Uber Faces Two Test Cases At Employment Tribunal

    “The two test cases, which began on 20 July, centre on the drivers' claim that the terms and conditions of their work with Uber mean that they are not technically self-employed and should be entitled to a range of benefits including sickness and holiday pay. “In his witness statement, one Claimant said that his net earnings for August 2015 after expenses were just £5.03 per hour, which is significantly less than minimum wage. However, Uber claimed that, based on the total number of hours logged into the app, he had been paid £13.77 on an average hourly basis. “On the first day of the tribunal, Counsel acting for Uber sought to show that the Claimants were self-employed as they can freely choose when they work. Uber argue that drivers have choice over their work and that there is nothing requiring them to work exclusively for Uber. “However, the Claimants disagree, stating that they do not believe they have free choice and that they are controlled very closely by the company. “This case follows on from the Pimlico Plumbers case and attempts to address key concerns around classification of workers and self-employed. The outcome of this case could have serious implications for Uber. If the drivers are deemed employees, Uber and many other UK businesses with similar business models may be seriously affected. “Over recent years, there have been a number of cases attempting to deal with the blurred lines between self-employed and workers. Increasing numbers of individuals miss out on employment rights due to the companies they work for misclassifying them as self-employed, which helps them avoid the costs of minimum wage, holiday pay, sick pay and possible National Insurance Contributions. "A ruling in favour of the drivers could therefore open the floodgates to an array of individuals coming forward and claiming they have been wrongly labelled, this could lead to some substantial payments to HMRC and compensation to individuals whom companies wrongly failed to treat as workers. Businesses should therefore start reviewing the terms and conditions of their working arrangements to try and prevent any claims in the future.”

    Continue Reading

Send Us Your Enquiry

Enter your details below and one of our experts will endeavour to call you back as soon as possible.

© 2017 Irwin Mitchell LLP is Authorised & Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Our Regulatory Information.